What is da Vinci Surgery?

The da Vinci Surgical System allows surgeons to perform minimally invasive surgery with the help of robotic arms. The machine consists of four, thin robotic arms inserted into strategically placed incisions just one to two centimeters long. The surgeon operates while seated at a console unit, using hand and foot controls, and with a 3D, high-definition view of the surgical field. It can simulate an open surgical environment without the physical trauma of large incisions.

What are the benefits of da Vinci Surgery?

The da Vinci System enables surgeons to perform even the most complex and delicate procedures through very small, precise incisions.

Benefits for patients may include:

  • Less pain
  • Less blood loss
  • Less scarring
  • Shorter recovery time
  • Quicker return to normal daily activities
  • Often offers better clinical outcomes

At Cleveland Clinic, operative times for robotic-assisted procedures have been comparable to laparotomy, with less blood loss, fewer complications and shorter hospital stays.

According to Dr. Tommaso Falcone , a leader in performing minimally invasive gynecological procedures, “Advancements in robot-assisted surgery allow us to bring new treatment options to a larger group of patients. For example, women who were previously not candidates for laparoscopic myomectomy to remove uterine fibroids now have an option that can preserve their uterus and potentially their fertility. This is a huge step forward for women's health."

What procedures can be performed with da Vinci surgery?

The following procedures are available using robot-assisted laparoscopy:

  • Tubal surgery
  • Fibroid surgery
  • Cancer surgery
  • Hysterectomy
  • Prolapse and incontinence surgery

Who performs da Vinci surgery?

Robotic-certified members of Cleveland Clinic's Obstetrics & Gynecology staff include:


Ashraf El-Dabh, MD
Julian Peskin, MD
M. Jean Uy-Kroh, MD
David Vexler, MD

Gynecologic Oncology

Robert DeBernardo, MD
Jason Knight, MD
Chad Michener, MD
Peter Rose, MD

Infertility and Gynecology

Tommaso Falcone, MD

Urogynecology & Pelvic Floor Dysfunction

Marie Fidela Paraiso, MD

Reviewed by a Cleveland Clinic medical professional.


  1. Barakat E, Bedaiwy MA, Falcone T. Innovative roles for surgical robotics in reproductive surgery. Curr Women's Health Rev. 2010 May;6(2):177-182.
  2. Haber GP, White MA, Autorino R, Escobar PF, Kroh MD, Chalikonda S, Khanna R, Forest S, Yang B, Altunrende F, Stein RJ, Kaouk JH. Novel robotic da Vinci instruments for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Urology. 2010 Dec;76(6):1279-1282.
  3. Muffly TM, Diwadkar GB, Paraiso MFR. Lumbosacral osteomyelitis after robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy and sacral colpopexy. Int Urogynecol J. 2010 Dec;21(12):1569-1571.
  4. Barakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimberg S, Nutter B, Nosseir M, Falcone T. Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;117(2 Pt 1):256-266.
  5. Bedaiwy MA, Barakat EM, Falcone T. Robotic tubal anastomosis: technical aspects. _JSLS._2011 Jan-Mar;15(1):10-15.
  6. Catenacci M, Flyckt RL, Falcone T. Robotics in reproductive surgery: Strengths and limitations. Placenta. 2011 Sep;32 Suppl 3:S232-S237.
  7. Debernardo R, Starks D, Barker N, Armstrong A, Kunos CA. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:139867.
  8. Escobar PF, Kebria M, Falcone T. Evaluation of a novel single-port robotic platform in the cadaver model for the performance of various procedures in gynecologic oncology. Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Mar;120(3):380-384.
  9. Escobar PF, Haber GP, Kaouk J, Kroh M, Chalikonda S, Falcone T. Single-port surgery: laboratory experience with the da Vinci single-site platform. JSLS. 2011 Apr-Jun;15(2):136-141.
  10. Falcone T. Robotics in gynecological surgery: The story so far and a glimpse into the future. Expert Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Jul;6(4):361-363.
  11. Frick AC, Barakat EE, Stein RJ, Mora M, Falcone T. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic management of ureteral endometriosis. JSLS. 2011 Jul-Sep;15(3):396-399.
  12. Reddy J, Ridgeway B, Gurland B, Paraiso MFR. Robotic sacrocolpoperineopexy with ventral rectopexy for the combined treatment of rectal and pelvic organ prolapse: Initial report and technique. J Robot Surg. 2011 Sep;5(3):167-173.
  13. Kroh M, El-Hayek K, Rosenblatt S, Chand B, Escobar P, Kaouk J, Chalikonda S. First human surgery with a novel single-port robotic system: cholecystectomy using the da Vinci Single-Site platform. Surg Endosc. 2011 Nov;25(11):3566-3573.
  14. Paraiso MFR, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CCG, Barber MD. Laparoscopic compared with robotic sacrocolpopexy for vaginal prolapse: a randomized controlled trial. _Obstet Gynecol._2011 Nov;118(5):1005-1013.
  15. Weinberg L, Rao S, Escobar PF. Robotic surgery in gynecology: an updated systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2011;2011:852061.
  16. Carvalho L, Abrao MS, Deshpande A, Falcone T. Robotics as a new surgical minimally invasive approach to treatment of endometriosis: a systematic review. Int J Med Robot. 2012 Jun;8(2):160-165.
  17. Escobar PF, Knight J, Kroh M, Chalikonda S, Kaouk J, Stein R. Single-port hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection in the porcine model: Feasibility and validation of a novel robotic lightweight endoscope positioner. Gynecol Surg. 2012 Feb;9(1):97-101.
  18. Escobar PF, Frumovitz M, Soliman PT, Frasure HE, Fader AN, Schmeler KM, Ramirez PT. Comparison of single-port laparoscopy, standard laparoscopy, and robotic surgery in patients with endometrial cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 May;19(5):1583-1588.
  19. Escobar PF, Knight J, Rao S, Weinberg L. da Vinci(R) single-site platform: anthropometrical, docking and suturing considerations for hysterectomy in the cadaver model. _Int J Med Robot._2012 Jun;8(2):191-195.
  20. Fagotti A, Gagliardi ML, Fanfani F, Salerno MG, Ercoli A, D'Asta M, Tortorella L, Turco LC, Escobar P, Scambia G. Perioperative outcomes of total laparoendoscopic single-site hysterectomy versus total robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients: a multicentre study. Gynecol Oncol. 2012 Jun;125(3):552-555.
  21. Orady M, Hrynewych A, Nawfal AK, Wegienka G. Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches. JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):542-548.
  22. Isac W, Kaouk J, Altunrende F, Rizkala E, Autorino R, Hillyer SP, Laydner H, Long JA, Kassab A, Khalifeh A, Panumatrassamee K, Eyraud R, Falcone T, Haber GP, Stein RJ. Robot-assisted ureteroneocystostomy: technique and comparative outcomes. _J Endourol._2013 Mar;27(3):318-323.
  23. Laydner H, Huang SS, Heston WD, Autorino R, Wang X, Harsch KM, Magi-Galluzzi C, Isac W, Khanna R, Hu B, Escobar P, Chalikonda S, Rao PK, Haber GP, Kaouk JH, Stein RJ. Robotic real-time near infrared targeted fluorescence imaging in a murine model of prostate cancer: A feasibility study. Urology. 2013 Feb;81(2):451-457.
  24. Paraiso MFR, Ridgeway B, Park AJ, Jelovsek JE, Barber MD, Falcone T, Einarsson JI. A randomized trial comparing conventional and robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy. _Am J Obstet Gynecol. _2013 May;208(5):368.e1-368.e7.

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy