Appointments

866.320.4573

Request an Appointment

Questions

800.223.2273

Contact us with Questions

Expand Content

Choosing Ablation to Treat AF

Heart & Vascular Institute Physician eNewsletter - Spring 2011

AF is the most common arrhythmia problem, and medications have traditionally been useful for managing the condition. But the more Cleveland Clinic cardiologists and electrophysiologists follow patients taking medications to control their rhythm or prevent stroke, the more they realize that the long-term effects of drug therapy can result in adverse side effects or risks.   

In the past decade, the movement toward ablation for AF has proved effective, and as shown in several large, multi-center trials, ablation actually serves as a better solution for some patients.

"Four years ago, I would have said that patients should try medications first before ablation, and I almost always do use medications first," says Bruce D. Lindsay, MD, FACC, FHRS, section head, Electrophysiology & Pacing for Cleveland Clinic Heart & Vascular Institute. "But if a patient has reviewed all the information we provide and understands what is involved in ablation and wants to make an informed decision, it’s reasonable to proceed to the ablation procedure. As technologies and techniques improve, we can continue to improve the success rate for a single ablation procedure."

Drug Therapy for AF

One of the big problems physicians confront when treating AF is depicted here (figure 1). Warfarin as a drug can be difficult to regulate and patient response is sometimes challenging to predict. Also, considering the narrow therapeutic window in the chart, if the International Normalized Ratio (INR) measuring how long it takes blood to clot is not in that 65-percent range most of the time, the patient does not benefit much from taking Warfarin. If the INR is too low, there is a steep increase in stroke risk, which drives up the risk of intercranial hemorrhage.

Figure 1: Relationship Between Clinical Events and INR—Intensity in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Meanwhile, a study of patients who were not eligible for Warfarin but instead took a combination of aspirin and Clopidogrel, showed a distinct advantage with fewer strokes, but more bleeding. "There is some advantage in reducing stroke with the combination of aspirin and Clopidogrel, but when you compare that to Coumadin, it is not as effective," Dr. Lindsay points out (figure 2).

Figure 2: Active A: Primary Outcomes—Stroke, MI, Non-CNS, Systemic Embolism and Vascular Death

The question: Where do we go from here, especially because of questions surrounding Coumadin and its side effects?

One answer could be dabigatran, a newer anticoagulant drug that showed a lower risk of intercranial hemorrhage in the RE-LY non-inferiority trial. In another study comparing the antiarrhythmic medication dronedaron with a placebo, the rate of first hospitalization for death was significantly reduced at a mean follow-up of 21 months with dronedaron. However, the dronedarone group has higher rates of bradycardia, QT-interval prolongation, nausea, diarrhea, rash and increased serum creatinine levels (figure 3). In one trial involving patients with severe heart failure, dronedarone was found to increase overall mortality, raising serious concern about the safety of this drug for patients with advanced heart failure.

Figure 3

Overall, the efficacy of dronedaron for AF is about 40 to 45 percent.

Dr. Lindsay says the underlying message is that medications are limiting and ablation can be a more effective, lasting treatment for patients with AF.  Whether ablation eliminates the risk of stroke is still being studied.

Opting for Ablation

Today, it’s the electrophysiologists job to not just perform ablation procedures, but to educate patients who are dealing with AF about available options so they can make an informed decision. Each patient’s situation is different, so there is no one ideal treatment for AF, Dr. Lindsay says.

With focal ablation, which involves blockage of electrical signals to the pulmonary veins, ablation techniques have evolved to include the pulmonary vein antral regions. The single procedure efficacy for paroxysmal AF is 60 to 80 percent (redo rates are about 20 to 30 percent); and efficacy for persistent AF is 40 to 60 percent. In reviewing Cleveland Clinic data from 2009, there were no deaths, strokes, or esophageal injuries  in the patients who received focal ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF. At experienced centers the mortality rate is 0.1 to 0.2 percent. Risk of pulmonary vein stenosis is 1 percent or less.

In randomized trials, the efficacy of ablation vs. medications is 58 to 88 percent effective for ablation vs. 7 to 45 percent for medications (table 1).

Table 1
Trial N Ablation Medications
Cryothermal 245 58% 7%
CABANA 60 65% 45%
Wilver. JAMA
2010:303:333
167 66% 16%
Jais Circulation
2008:118:2498
118 88% 24%
Pappone JACC
2006:48:2340
198 87% 25%

"The direct comparisons we have thus far suggest that ablation therapy is superior to drug therapy for treatment of AF, but treating with one or two antiarrhythmic drugs is advisable before proceeding to ablation," Dr. Lindsay says. CABANA is a national multicenter study designed to compare long term outcomes of ablation compared with medical therapy. This study will evaluate the effectiveness of these approaches and compare the risk of stroke, hospitalization, and death.

Hybrid therapy is important for many patients. "Sometimes after an ablation, patients with complex heart disease may require drug therapy after ablation to manage the condition," Dr. Lindsay says.

More Information
Reviewed: 04/11

Talk to a Nurse: Mon. - Fri., 8:30 a.m. - 4 p.m. (ET)

Call a Heart & Vascular Nurse locally 216.445.9288 or toll-free 866.289.6911.

Schedule an Appointment

Toll-free 800.659.7822

This information is provided by Cleveland Clinic and is not intended to replace the medical advice of your doctor or health care provider. Please consult your health care provider for advice about a specific medical condition.

© Copyright 2014 Cleveland Clinic. All rights reserved.

HealthHub from Cleveland Clinic

Read the Latest from Our Experts About cctopics » Heart & Vascular Health
High Blood Pressure? Don’t Take Vitamin D for It (Video)
11/20/14 8:31 a.m.
Sellers of vitamin D claim the nutrient can lower your blood pressure. But don’t believe the hype. Despite claims from the nutrition industry and non-medical personnel abou...
by Steven Nissen, MD
When Your Heart Stents Narrow, Brachytherapy Can Help
11/19/14 8:22 a.m.
Cardiac stents are an effective, nonsurgical way of holding a narrowed or blocked artery open to increase blood...
A Post ER Follow-Up Could Save Your Life
11/17/14 8:39 a.m.
Even if Emergency Room doctors say you didn’t actually have a heart attack, that doesn’t mean you h...
Recipe: Low-Fat Crunchy Pumpkin Pie
11/14/14 7:00 a.m.
This low-fat crunchy pumpkin pie uses only a small amount of oil in the crust and skim milk in the filling to m...
Varicose Veins: Not Just an Older Woman’s Problem
11/13/14 8:13 a.m.
You might think of varicose veins as an older woman’s problem, but it may actually have more to do with your li...