Clinical Trials

Toll-Free: 866.320.4573

Call Us Toll Free:

866.223.2273 x1234

Comparison of the Efficacy of a Biological Implant to Reinforce Overlapping Sphincter Repair Versus Overlapping Sphincter Repair Alone

Study:

n/a

Rationale:

n/a

Purpose:

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Biodesign™ Surgisis® Tissue Graft to reinforce an overlapping sphincter repair versus the standard overlapping sphincter repair in controlling episodes of incontinence in patients who have fecal incontinence and a defect in the anal sphincter.

Study Status: Recruiting

Recruiting:
Margaret Terry, LPN, BBA 216-445-4790 TERRYM@ccf.org

Condition Intervention Phase
Fecal Incontinence
Anal Incontinence		 Device: Biodesign Tissue Repair Graft
Other: Overlapping Sphincter Repair		 N/A

Verified by Cook April, 2013

Sponsored by: Cook
Information provided by: Cook
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01044589

Study Type: Interventional

Study Design: Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
United States

n/a

This information is abridged to display results relevant only to Cleveland Clinic. To see complete record visit ClinicalTrials.gov
  Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.