Clinical Trials

Toll-Free: 866.320.4573

Call Us Toll Free:

866.223.2273 x1234

Comparison of the Efficacy of a Biological Implant to Reinforce Overlapping Sphincter Repair Versus Overlapping Sphincter Repair Alone

Study:

n/a

Rationale:

n/a

Purpose:

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy of Biodesign™ Surgisis® Tissue Graft to reinforce an overlapping sphincter repair versus the standard overlapping sphincter repair in controlling episodes of incontinence in patients who have fecal incontinence and a defect in the anal sphincter.

Study Status: Recruiting

Recruiting:
Margaret Terry, LPN, BBA 216-445-4790 TERRYM@ccf.org

Condition Intervention Phase
Fecal Incontinence
Anal Incontinence
Device: Biodesign Tissue Repair Graft
Other: Overlapping Sphincter Repair
N/A

Verified by Cook April, 2013

Sponsored by: Cook
Information provided by: Cook
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01044589

Study Type: Interventional

Study Design: Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
United States

n/a

This information is abridged to display results relevant only to Cleveland Clinic. To see complete record visit ClinicalTrials.gov
  Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.

Cleveland Clinic Mobile Site