Clinical Trials

Toll-Free: 866.320.4573

Call Us Toll Free:

866.223.2273 x1234

Comparing the Effectiveness of Repairing Versus Replacing the Heart`s Mitral Valve in People With Severe Chronic Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

Study:

Evaluation of Outcomes Following Mitral Valve Repair/Replacement in Severe Chronic Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation

Rationale:

n/a

Purpose:

People with coronary artery disease (CAD) or people who have had a heart attack may develop a leak in the mitral valve of their heart and may therefore need to undergo surgery to fix the valve. The best way to fix the mitral valve remains undetermined. This study will evaluate whether it is better for people with severe mitral valve leakage to undergo a mitral valve replacement procedure or a mitral valve repair procedure.

Study Status: Active, not recruiting

Recruiting:
n/a

Condition Intervention Phase
Mitral Valve Insufficiency
Coronary Artery Disease
Procedure: Mitral Valve Repair with Annuloplasty
Procedure: Mitral Valve Replacement
Phase 2

Verified by Mount Sinai School of Medicine January, 2013

Sponsored by: Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Information provided by: Mount Sinai School of Medicine
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00807040

Study Type: Interventional

Study Design: Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor), Primary Purpose: Treatment

Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
United States

Timothy Gardner, MD., Study Chair
Patrick O`Gara, MD., Study Chair
Annetine C. Gelijns, Ph.D.., Principal Investigator

This information is abridged to display results relevant only to Cleveland Clinic. To see complete record visit ClinicalTrials.gov
  Information obtained from ClinicalTrials.gov on
Link to the current ClinicalTrials.gov record.

Cleveland Clinic Mobile Site